|
|
Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Posted:
Feb 24, 2012 5:51 AM
|
|
On Feb 24, 8:24 pm, Zuhair <zaljo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 24, 12:55 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 24, 7:29 pm, Zuhair <zaljo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > and one advice to you Herc, every definition has specifications
> > > and claims about it are meant to be according to the specifications
> > > already set on that definition, of course if you don't abid by those
> > > specifications then of course it will not work as it meant to be.
>
> > > My claim was clear (a,b) defined as
>
> > > (a,b)= { {1,{a}} , {2,{b}} } where 1={{}} or 2={{} ,{{}} }
>
> > Who's definition is this?
>
> MINE. It seem that you were not reading man.
>
You just said:
claims about it are meant to be according to the specifications
already set on that definition,
definition that might generalize to m-tuples
is to define them as sequences so
(a_1,...,a_m)={<{},a_1>,<{{}},a_2>,<{{},{{}}},a_3>,..., <m_th
ordinal,a_m>}
You're not a precise computer!
Graham Cooper
Groom Computer
Wife Finder
Adam
|
|
