|
|
Re: Why not Hausdorff's ordered pairs
Posted:
Feb 24, 2012 6:34 AM
|
|
On Feb 24, 9:07 pm, Zuhair <zaljo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > definition that might generalize to m-tuples
> > is to define them as sequences so
> > (a_1,...,a_m)={<{},a_1>,<{{}},a_2>,<{{},{{}}},a_3>,..., <m_th
> > ordinal,a_m>}
>
> > You're not a precise computer!
>
> Yes this is ANOTHER fact, of course you can do that, this works no
> doubt
> what I am saying is that can be further simplified by my last
> approach.
>
>
you added the braces around {a} {b} {c} for a reason, so you could
determine the {position,{data}} order.
Anyway there is no more to be said... but you missed out getting
eternal recognition putting your name to 1 of dozens O(n^2) data
structures in preference to my O(n) ordinal index system!
Cooper Ordinal Index
{ { C,{} } , {{ O,{} }} , {{{ I,{} }}} }
Herc
|
|
