Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Why time can't be a dimension
Replies: 76   Last Post: Mar 14, 2012 10:10 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
mpc755@gmail.com

Posts: 1,279
Registered: 1/8/09
Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Posted: Mar 10, 2012 8:35 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Feb 5, 12:47 am, PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote:

> That's the part that's written by a nonexpert journalist. You just
> don't get it, do you?
> Cold dark matter is not part of the Standard Model. You can look up
> the Standard Model if you wish.
> Or you can read half-assed articles written by nonexpert journalists,
> who get things muddied up.


'The standard model of cosmogony'
Speaker: Prof. Carlos S. Frenk, Director of the Institute for
Computational Cosmology, Durham University, England
http://www.h-its.org/english/events/colloquia.php?we_objectID=776

"The standard model of cosmology, "Lambda cold dark matter,'' or LCDM,
has been remarkably successful in accounting for a large body of
observational data, spanning a wide range of physical and temporal
scales. Yet, the model is based on a number of fundamental assumptions
for which there is no direct evidence, for example, that the dark
matter is made up of some form of cold collisionless elementary
particle. I will first review the current state of the LCDM model and
the data that have earned it the status of "standard model of
cosmogony."

'The haloes of bright satellite galaxies in a warm dark matter
universe'
Mark R. Lovell1?, Vincent Eke1, Carlos S. Frenk1, Liang Gao2,1, Adrian
Jenkins1, Tom Theuns1,3, Jie Wang1, Simon D. M. White4, Alexey
Boyarsky5,6, and Oleg Ruchayskiy7
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1104.2929v2.pdf

"Measurements of temperature anisotropies in the microwave background
radiation (e.g. Komatsu et al. 2011), of galaxy clustering on large
scales (e.g. Cole et al. 2005), and of the currently accelerated
expansion of the Universe (e.g Clocchiatti et al. 2006; Guy et al.
2010) have confirmed the ?Lambda cold dark matter? (CDM) model, first
explored theoretically 25 years ago (Davis et al. 1985), as the
standard model of cosmogony."

Lambda-CDM model
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda-CDM_model

"ËCDM or Lambda-CDM is an abbreviation for Lambda-Cold Dark Matter,
which is also known as the cold dark matter model with dark energy. It
is frequently referred to as the standard model of big bang
cosmology"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda-CDM_model

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14948730

"Prof Frenk said that after working for 35 years with the predictions
of the standard model, he is "losing sleep" over the results of the
simulations."

"Leading cosmologist Carlos Frenk spoke of the "disturbing"
developments at the British Science Festival in Bradford."

"An alternative cause for the discrepancies between the modelled data
and what we observe is much more fundamental: that CDM does not exist,
and the predictions of the standard model relating to it are false."

What is presently postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is aether.
Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space.
Aether is physically displaced by matter. Aether displaced by matter
pushes back toward the matter. Displaced aether pushing back toward
matter is gravity.

Aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a
solid; an incompressible fluid.

http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2012/mar/HQ_12-068_Hubble_Dark_Core.html

"Astronomers using data from NASA's Hubble Telescope have observed
what appears to be a clump of dark matter left behind from a wreck
between massive clusters of galaxies. The result could challenge
current theories about dark matter that predict galaxies should be
anchored to the invisible substance even during the shock of a
collision."

""This result is a puzzle," said astronomer James Jee of the
University of California in Davis, lead author of paper about the
results available online in The Astrophysical Journal. "Dark matter is
not behaving as predicted, and it's not obviously clear what is going
on. It is difficult to explain this Hubble observation with the
current theories of galaxy formation and dark matter.""

The results is not a puzzle.

What NASA's Hubble Telescope has detected, which is incorrectly
described as dark matter left behind, is aether.

""We know of maybe six examples of high-speed galaxy cluster
collisions where the dark matter has been mapped," Jee said. "But the
Bullet Cluster and Abell 520 are the two that show the clearest
evidence of recent mergers, and they are inconsistent with each other.
No single theory explains the different behavior of dark matter in
those two collisions. We need more examples.""

Aether displacement explains the behavior of the aether in those two
collisions.

Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space.
Aether is physically displaced by matter.

Dark matter does not travel with matter. Matter moves through and
displaces the aether.

Dark matter is not left behind after galaxy clusters collide. Aether
was there all the time.


Date Subject Author
3/3/12
Read Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/4/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
micky
3/5/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/5/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
micky
3/5/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/4/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
vtcapo
3/4/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
adamk
3/4/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/4/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
vtcapo
3/4/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/4/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
vtcapo
3/5/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/5/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
vtcapo
3/5/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/6/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
vtcapo
3/6/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/6/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
vtcapo
3/6/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/6/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
vtcapo
3/6/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/6/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
vtcapo
3/6/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Brian Q. Hutchings
3/7/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/7/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
vtcapo
3/7/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/7/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
vtcapo
3/7/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/7/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
vtcapo
3/7/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/7/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
vtcapo
3/7/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/7/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
vtcapo
3/7/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/7/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Brian Q. Hutchings
3/4/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Daryl McCullough
3/4/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
adamk
3/4/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Frederick Williams
3/5/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Frederick Williams
3/5/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Daryl McCullough
3/6/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Brian Q. Hutchings
3/7/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Brian Q. Hutchings
3/4/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
xxein
3/4/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
KBH
3/8/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Brian Q. Hutchings
3/5/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Alfonso
3/5/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Yousuf Khan
3/5/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/5/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Yousuf Khan
3/5/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/6/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Yousuf Khan
3/6/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/6/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Frederick Williams
3/7/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Tim Golden http://bandtech.com
3/7/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Frederick Williams
3/8/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Brian Q. Hutchings
3/8/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/9/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Frederick Williams
3/9/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/9/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Tim Golden http://bandtech.com
3/14/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Brian Q. Hutchings
3/14/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Brian Q. Hutchings
3/8/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Brian Q. Hutchings
3/8/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Brian Q. Hutchings
3/9/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Frederick Williams
3/8/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
suzysewnshow
3/8/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
PD
3/10/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
suzysewnshow
3/10/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
mpc755@gmail.com
3/11/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/11/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
mpc755@gmail.com
3/12/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/14/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Brian Q. Hutchings
3/8/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com
3/9/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Tim Golden http://bandtech.com
3/9/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
Brian Q. Hutchings
3/9/12
Read Re: Why time can't be a dimension
microm2011@hotmail.com

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.