Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: 0^0=1
Replies: 145   Last Post: May 7, 2012 8:08 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
William Hale

Posts: 48
Registered: 5/2/12
Re: 0^0=1
Posted: May 2, 2012 10:41 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
<3d9c46fc-7b90-4dfc-9161-b6d240725a60@ee2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
Dan Christensen <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> wrote:

> On May 2, 6:13 pm, Gus Gassmann <horand.gassm...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:

> > On May 2, 5:33 pm, Dan Christensen <Dan_Christen...@sympatico.ca>
> > wrote:
> >

> > > Like I said, it depends on your application, but I don't see how you
> > > can sensibly assign any number to the sum or product of an empty list
> > > of numbers. Not from a programming perspective anyway.

> >
> > Holy smokes, Dan. I've seen you say some pretty asinine things, but
> > this one surely takes the cake.
> >
> > *Especially* from a programming perspective it makes eminent sense to
> > assign 0 to the sum of an empty list of numbers and 1 to the product:
> >

>
> From a programming perspective, if you aren't given anything to add or
> multiply how much sense does it make to return any numerical answer
> from a sum or product function? Get real!


But it is real. Same thing is done for the factorial of 0 and the
concatenation of an empty array of strings (i.e., the array is an array
of strings and the number of elements in the array happens to be zero).
In particular, 0 factorial is 1 and the concatenation of the string
array [] is "".

Likewise, the union of an empty collection of sets is the empty set,
while the intersection of an empty collection of sets is the universal
set (assuming that there is a universal set, or at least a set that
every set being talked about is a subset).

>
>

> > unsigned int n;
> > new double x[n];
> > double prod = 1, sum = 0;
> > for (j=0; j <n; j++)
> > {
> >     sum  = sum  + x[j];
> >     prod = prod * x[j];
> >
> > }
> >

>
> > Surely even you can understand that it is better to program, compile
> > and execute the loop in this form without any artificial if statement
> > to cater to special cases such as n=0 or n=1.

>
> Huh? You've never programmed anything more complicated than your alarm
> clock, have you, Gus?
>
> Dan
> Download my DC Proof 2.0 software at http://www.dcproof.com
> Also see video demo



Date Subject Author
5/1/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Jesse F. Hughes
5/1/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
David W. Cantrell
5/1/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/1/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
David W. Cantrell
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Michael Stemper
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Jussi Piitulainen
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Rotwang
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
jbriggs444@gmail.com
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Horand.Gassmann@googlemail.com
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
William Hale
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
William Hale
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
William Hale
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
William Hale
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
mike3
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Horand.Gassmann@googlemail.com
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Horand.Gassmann@googlemail.com
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/4/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Horand.Gassmann@googlemail.com
5/4/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/4/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Marshall
5/4/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/5/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Marshall
5/5/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Marshall
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Marshall
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
LudovicoVan
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/4/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Marshall
5/4/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/5/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/5/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/5/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Marshall
5/5/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Marshall
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
William Hale
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
LudovicoVan
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/7/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
William Hale
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Marshall
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Marshall
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Butch Malahide
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
William Hale
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
William Hale
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
William Hale
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
billh04
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
LudovicoVan
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
LudovicoVan
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
LudovicoVan
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Horand.Gassmann@googlemail.com
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
LudovicoVan
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
LudovicoVan
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Jussi Piitulainen
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
LudovicoVan
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Jussi Piitulainen
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
LudovicoVan
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Ki Song
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Jussi Piitulainen
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Jussi Piitulainen
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Ki Song
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Jussi Piitulainen
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
LudovicoVan
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Ki Song
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Jussi Piitulainen
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Ki Song
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
William Hale
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
LudovicoVan
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Jussi Piitulainen
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
LudovicoVan
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
LudovicoVan
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
William Hale
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
LudovicoVan
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Ki Song
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
LudovicoVan
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
LudovicoVan
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
LudovicoVan
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
LudovicoVan
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
William Hale
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
LudovicoVan
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/6/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/4/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Ki Song
5/4/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Horand.Gassmann@googlemail.com
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Virgil
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Jussi Piitulainen
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Frederick Williams
5/3/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Dan Christensen
5/2/12
Read Re: 0^0=1
Jussi Piitulainen

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.