Marshall
Posts:
1,928
Registered:
8/9/06
|
|
Re: 0^0=1
Posted:
May 6, 2012 12:12 AM
|
|
On Saturday, May 5, 2012 8:58:05 PM UTC-7, Dan Christensen wrote:
>
> Gus's code returns a value of 1 when even when NO numbers are supplied
> to be multiplied together!
Right. And it returns 0 as the sum of no numbers. The fact
that the code to do it that way is simpler than anything you're
proposing is not a coincidence.
> How much sense does that make?
To people who've put significantly more time and effort
into the question than you have, it makes perfect sense.
> While you are at it, please explain how it is possible
> to multiply less than two numbers together.
The explanations given previously have been more
than sufficient for someone who was open to
learning more about the issue.
Marshall
|
|
