LudovicoVan
Posts:
2,971
From:
London
Registered:
2/8/08
|
|
Re: 0^0=1
Posted:
May 7, 2012 12:26 PM
|
|
"Frederick Williams" <freddywilliams@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:4FA7F575.DF9FB327@btinternet.com...
> LudovicoVan wrote:
>
>> I haven't read the whole thread myself: I'd suggest you at least read
>> the
>> posts by David W. Cantrell.
>
> But David W. Cantrell's posts do not support the "0^0 isn't 1" view. I
> see 13 of them:
I didn't say otherwise, I actually didn't say anything at all about what he
said (though his posts do not strictly support the 0^0=1 view either, IMHO).
His posts make an interesting and competent reading on these matters, that's
what I meant.
-LV
|
|
