Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
Virgil
Posts:
4,674
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Matheology S 062
Posted:
Jul 11, 2012 5:30 PM
|
|
In article
<740ca06c-d6cf-4016-968c-8795107ed6d0@n16g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 11 Jul., 22:06, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <bde42209-2591-4dda-b354-cc075afbd...@m3g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > On 11 Jul., 05:01, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@phiwumbda.org> wrote:
> >
> > > > >>>>> Same with you. Answer the mathematical side of the problem,
> > > > >>>>> pleeze, if
> > > > >>>>> you can:
> >
> > > > >>>>> 01
> > > > >>>>> 0.1
> > > > >>>>> 010.1
> > > > >>>>> 01.01
> > > > >>>>> 0101.01
> > > > >>>>> 010.101
> > > > >>>>> ...
> >
> > > > >>>>> Enough to see how it continues?
> > > > >>> It is another thing entirely to relate that
> > > > >>> back to the balls in urn problem, because he has very carefully
> > > > >>> obliterated the connection,
> >
> > > > >> Here you can see the connection:
> >
> > > > >>>>>>>>> 21
> > > > >>>>>>>>> 2.1
> > > > >>>>>>>>> 432.1
> > > > >>>>>>>>> 43.21
> > > > >>>>>>>>> 6543.21
> > > > >>>>>>>>> 654.321
> >
> > > > > You'll be fired eventually.
> >
> > > > I'm sorry to say that I doubt it.
> >
> > > That may depend on your ability to answer my question: Why are the
> > > sequences above absolutely unrelated, incomparable and nonsense?
> >
> > They are unrelated to the problem that WM is trying to muzzle.
>
> But the sequence
> But now turn to a useful application of your knowledge and expain:
> 01
> 0.1
> 010.1
> 01.01
> 0101.01
> 010.101
> ...
> is part of mathematics. What is the limit? According to your arguing
> it should be 0, at least if the digits are wandering from the left to
> the right.
While I have said that in the original vse problem there does exist a
limit, I have not claimed that your problem has one. If you want one,
you will have to find it yourself.
At best you are making a one set original problem (the set of balls in
the vase at time t) into a three set problem, which is an unnecessary
complication.
--
|
|
|
|
