On 20 Jul., 22:33, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > In article > <5b725e76-deb2-4e49-b704-2e810ed67...@fr28g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > On 20 Jul., 10:28, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > > > Yes. The new view on infinity. The finity of the set of numbers and > > > > the fact that this finity is not relevant for doing mathematics but > > > > only to show set theory false. Further: What cannot be distinguished > > > > cannot be a number. > > > > That part being, according to a prior post of WM's, unnecessary and > > > often omitted in an introductory course, > > > In fact it appears only in the preface and does not get mentioned > > further. > > > > and the rest of it being > > > something that can be cobbled together from other elementary books, It > > > appears that as far as WM was creative, he was also irrelevant and as > > > far as he was relevant, he ws not at all creative. > > > The presentation has been created by myself. But with respect to the > > mathematics presented, you are right correct with very few exceptions. > > > > > You may judge if you are able to recognize this construct and > > > > determine its limit > > > > > 0 1 > > > > 0 . 1 > > > > 0 1 0 . 1 > > > > 0 1 . 0 1 > > > > 0 1 0 1 . 0 1 > > > > 0 1 0 . 1 0 1 > > > > a n d s o o o o o n > > > > AS there are infinitely many sequences which start out with the same > > > beginning, until WM can give a general rule for the sequence, > > > Of course (but I don't know whether it will help you): Continue as an > > intelligent being would do. > > Since WM is not an intelligent being, at least as real mathematicians > understand the term, and it is his sequence, that "hint" is no help.
But I would know how to continue from what has been posted recently: ((((((10^0)/10)+10^1)/10)+10^2)/10)+... = oo