The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: unable to prove?
Replies: 28   Last Post: Sep 18, 2012 3:54 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 141
Registered: 5/15/12
Re: unable to prove?
Posted: Aug 27, 2012 6:07 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"Frederick Williams" <> wrote in message
> dilettante wrote:
>> [...] I suppose it isn't known whether positing the
>> existence of the power set of the reals leads to a contradiction. Surely
>> also taking the existence of this set as an axiom doesn't do anything to
>> resolve CH (of course, as far as anyone knows - if it leads to a
>> contradiction it resolves everything, in a sense)? (Yes, that's a
>> question)

> It is known that if the axioms of set theory are consistent then they
> remain so with the addition of either CH (or even GCH) or not-CH.

But what do the axioms of set theory have to say about the power set of
the reals? Is that a set under the axioms, not a set, or are the axioms
agnostic on the matter?
> --
> The animated figures stand
> Adorning every public street
> And seem to breathe in stone, or
> Move their marble feet.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.