|
|
Re: If ZFC is a FORMAL THEORY ... then what is THEOREM 1 ?
Posted:
Oct 5, 2012 6:32 PM
|
|
On Oct 6, 12:20 am, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote:
> On Oct 5, 3:59 am, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Formal Theory means all sentences in the Theory are systematically
> > enumerated.
>
> Tht's Lie #1 . Who are you supposed to be? MItt Romney?
>
> > ZFC is NOT a formal Theory!
>
> That's Lie # 2. It's usually defined as an axiom-set but if you want
> to TALK set theory then it is
> the formal theory containng all and only the theoerms PROVEN FROM
> those axioms.
>
>
>
> > There is no method given to distinguish between theorems and predicate
> > calculus formulas.
>
> This is Lie # 3. It's not immediately rebuttable because you don't
> know what "predicate calculus formulas" MEANS, and because we don't
> talk that way.
>
> > You have NO WAY of enumerating Theorems!
>
> That's more like Lie # 0. THAT statement was BORN a lie.
> Since theorems are BY DEFINITION *proved*, they are BORN "enumerated".
> A theorem's proof IS its "number".
George's idiocy is in full bloom here!
His underlying contradictions and FAILURE TO STATE THEOREM 1 of ZFC
result in this copious false output and misunderstandings of what a
theorem, formula, or theory actually are.
Herc
|
|
