Does it have to be published for you to judge its truthfulness or its validity? The reader should note that the truthfulness and validity of the Bishop/Milgram paper has never been questioned as has been the case with the Boaler paper. Not even by Hake.
On Oct 19, 2012, at 6:00 PM, Richard Hake <email@example.com> wrote:
> whereas the unpublished, undated, and referenceless denunciation of > Boaler's research by Bishop, Clopton, & Milgram at > <http://tinyurl.com/czsa4c> does not.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]