Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.



Re: In Defense of the NRC's "Scientific Research in Education'"
Posted:
Nov 1, 2012 6:42 AM


On Nov 1, 2012, at 1:29 AM, Clyde Greeno @ MALEI wrote:
> I am a bit confused by Schremmer's "only" [ in (2)] ... since there > would seem to be other ways of using mathematical knowledge.
For reference, here is the sentence:
(2) [...] the result of the learning of mathematics can only appear in the learning of further mathematics. Else we are not talking about mathematics but whatever else.
Basically, what I had in mind is that:
a. Learning mathematics is like going to the gym in that it is self serving: The point of lifting 50 pounds is eventually to be able to lift 60 pounds and, overall, to feel better one way or the other.
b. Differential equations are the first mathematics that truly has applications. Any "use" before that is not a use of mathematics but just contrived makebelieves that we use to justify our salaries.
c. What my carpenter friends learned during their training is a bunch of computational/graphical recipes that they indeed use a lot but is not mathematics.
Regards schremmer **************************************************************************** * To post to the list: email mathedcc@mathforum.org * * To unsubscribe, email the message "unsubscribe mathedcc" to majordomo@mathforum.org * * Archives at http://mathforum.org/kb/forum.jspa?forumID=184 * ****************************************************************************



