The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: it's in there somewhere....
Replies: 13   Last Post: Jan 28, 2013 1:30 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
m. m. m.

Posts: 107
Registered: 11/28/11
Re: it's in there somewhere....
Posted: Nov 7, 2012 4:11 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Nov 7, 1:00 am, Timothy Sutter <> wrote:
> ====
> adiabatic.
> adj.
> Of, relating to, or being a reversible
> thermodynamic process that occurs without
> gain or loss of heat and without
> a change in entropy.
> ====
> see, unless one can posit that the expansion
> of the universe was something of this sort,
> one doesn't get a reversible process,
> and positting something of this sort will
> likewise fail because it will not allow
> for the formation of distinguishable
> particulate objects.
> meaning, if one were to suggest,
> that some 'other unknowable universe'
> was simply holding a gaseous deposit in 'it'
> until such time as 'it' spewed 'its' contents
> into what we would call 'our' spacial domain,
> the only way such a process could be reversible
> would be one in which no materials were ever
> formed and simply a 'plasmic' 'heat exchange'
> between dual spacial domains.
> very slow inflation from one
> spacial domain to the 'other' domain.
> the fact that we see integrated particulate matter
> tells us that we do not have a reversble adiabatic
> process between dual spacial domains and therefore
> are not looking at such a reversible process and
> therefore, our 'beginning' remains as the first
> and only knowable beginning.
> in other words, this relegates the
> 'cosmic flatulence' to an
> invalid sentiment.
> meaning, if we don't have a reversible
> adiabatic process, we dissipate all our
> heat and run out of fuels before the
> surface of endless time is even
> scratched and we should not be here
> to ponder the question,
> and if we do have a reversible
> adiabatic process, we don't
> get any particles.
> therefore, a primary singular one time
> initiation of the entire process by
> conscious intent remains as the only
> valid mechanism.
> the prospect of collapsing this universe
> into a zero order nothingness also remains
> as a possibility given conscious control
> of the system.
> the logistics of which only need take into
> account the possibility of some lynch pin
> collapse mechanism placed in our domain
> by the Creator.
> a minor alteration in any of
> the six numbers and the entire
> thing collapses into a
> zero order nothingness.
> likewise,
> ordering the six numbers
> initiates genesis.
> the magnificent concentration of design will.
> be it so

here and there

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.