The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Coulomb law does charge; Ampere law does spin Chapt13.4.03 Charge
and spin #1025 New Physics #1145 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Replies: 3   Last Post: Nov 23, 2012 4:15 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Roland Franzius

Posts: 586
Registered: 12/7/04
Re: Coulomb law does charge; Ampere law does spin Chapt13.4.03 Charge
and spin #1025 New Physics #1145 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Posted: Nov 23, 2012 3:44 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Am 23.11.2012 08:57, schrieb Archimedes Plutonium:
> Well, I had too much to eat for Thanksgiving. I saved up some special
> for dinner tonight and ate too much. So looks like I will try to eat
> just cereal for the next two days. I want to try to maintain my 137
> lbs weight that I had in High School, so that means some days of near
> fasting. But enough of that, lets get to important things.
> I had to make a detour into the electric motor, the rotor and thanks
> to Tim's responses, I am pretty sure the problem is with the
> Schrodinger Equation gives inaccurate descriptions of the "s"
> orbitals. The Schrodinger Equation gives spherical orbitals to the
> "s", but we all know the Dirac Equation relativizes the Schrodinger
> Equation. It puts the Schrodinger Equation into motion, so that the
> sphere is no longer a adequate description of the "s" orbital. So what
> happens when you put a sphere into motion? What figure comes out?
> Well, easily that a sphere produces when in motion is a cylinder
> shape.
> So the "s" orbitals of chemistry should really look like a cylinder
> rather than a sphere. Now the Schrodinger Equation gets a lot of
> elongated ellipses for the p, d, f orbitals. And if we put those into
> the Dirac Equation, it elongates them even more so. The Dirac Equation
> makes orbitals more like wire loops around the nucleus of an atom.

Thats of course not what you will find in text books.

The s=1/2, L=0, j=1/2 orbitals of hydrogen are spherical symmetric but
are carrying an intrinsic spin-induced electric current (see eg. Gordon
decomposition of current in Landau/Lifshitz).

What is not possible for a spherical symmetric spin 0 field - current is
an effect of the field gradient - is the normal case for a vector field:

Alle the spherical symmetric charge densities carry a fixed electric
current per sphere shell around an axis, resulting from the algebraic
imprinted vector current. It needs no field gradient.

This is the reason why these currents and their magnetic fields are
intrinsic and cannot slow down.

A ground state with vanishing current distributions does simply not exist.

Since spin and angular momentum are not distinguishable in not so
symmetric cases, it is much easier to say - in a quasiclassical
approximation, that for a spinor field the observable densities
current density "c gammma" and local angular momentum
"J = L + 1/2 sigma" never vanish.


Roland Franzius

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.