Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
dpb
Posts:
6,677
Registered:
6/7/07
|
|
Re: iterations adjustments UPDATED
Posted:
Nov 24, 2012 9:30 AM
|
|
On 11/24/2012 8:13 AM, ARTEMIS CIVIL wrote:
...
> I would like to ask you one more question: Previously, I had the code
> and a parameter "n" as an input in order to find the parameter Pu:
> output! Now, from experiments I know the real value of the parameter Pu,
> is it possible to find from the code the parameter n ( as an output) if
> I give the Pu as an input? could I "invert" the code?? Thanks in advance!
Well, you would have to do the inversion manually and recode the
algorithm to do that, but theoretically, "yes"...
Optionally, if you can write it as an expression, you perhaps can recast
it into a form for fsolve()
--
|
|
|
|
