The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » math-history-list

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: On the Mayan Ethno-mathematics of Divination:Debunking the Astronomical Dec
Replies: 5   Last Post: Dec 4, 2012 5:39 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Hossam Aboulfotouh

Posts: 161
From: Egypt
Registered: 7/20/07
Re: On the Mayan Ethno-mathematics of Divination:Debunking the Astronomical Dec
Posted: Nov 29, 2012 5:56 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


You reply without reading the paper via the given link.

The paper shows that the idea of multiplying any numeral column in the Mayan Codices or in the tables that were found 6 months ago in Xultun Guatemala, by the factors 20, 360, 7200, 144000, etc., is incorrect and misleading and do not give any date, Why? Because these tables are only for divination practices, based on using two sets of numbers. i.e., form 1-20 and from 1 to 13. That is I debunking the claims that say "there are Mayan astronomical tables". And this idea of the long count is thus factatious.

Its abstract is here below:

"Saturno et al. (Reports, Science Vol. 336, p714-717) claim that the numeric tables found on the inner walls of a small masonry-vaulted structure in the extensive Mayan ruins of Xultun, Guatemala record the movement of the moon, and perhaps Mars and Venus, and tables in Dresden Codex are of the likeness. Here I show that those types of Mayan tables record mere divination readings and do not include nor imply any astronomical records"

Hossam M. K. Aboulfotouh

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.