Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Induction is Wrong
Replies: 8   Last Post: Nov 30, 2012 5:55 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
reasterly@gmail.com

Posts: 609
Registered: 9/24/07
Induction is Wrong
Posted: Nov 29, 2012 9:27 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Andrew Boucher has developed a theory called General Arithmetic (GA):
http://www.andrewboucher.com/papers/ga.pdf

GA is a sub-theory of Peano Arithmetic (PA).
If we add an induction axiom (IND) to the axioms of Ring Theory (RT)
then
GA is also a sub-theory of RT+IND. (We also need a weak successor
axiom).

Boucher proves Lagrange's four square theorem, every number is the sum
of four
squares, is a theorem of GA. Since the four square theorem is not true
in the
integers, the integers can not be a model for GA, PA, or RT+IND.

GA also proves multiplication is commutative.
It is well known there are non-commutative rings.
There are even finite non-commutative rings:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090827201012AAD7qJg

Induction is wrong. It proves multiplication,
as defined by the axioms of ring theory,
must be commutative when this is not true.


Russell
- Integers are an illusion



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.