The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Induction is Wrong
Replies: 8   Last Post: Nov 30, 2012 5:55 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Dan Christensen

Posts: 8,219
Registered: 7/9/08
Re: Induction is Wrong
Posted: Nov 29, 2012 10:59 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Nov 29, 9:27 pm, RussellE <> wrote:
> Andrew Boucher has developed a theory called General Arithmetic (GA):
> GA is a sub-theory of Peano Arithmetic (PA).
> If we add an induction axiom (IND) to the axioms of Ring Theory (RT)
> then
> GA is also a sub-theory of RT+IND. (We also need a weak successor
> axiom).
> Boucher proves Lagrange's four square theorem, every number is the sum
> of four
> squares, is a theorem of GA. Since the four square theorem is not true
> in the
> integers, the integers can not be a model for GA, PA, or RT+IND.
> GA also proves multiplication is commutative.
> It is well known there are non-commutative rings.
> There are even finite non-commutative rings:
> Induction is wrong. It proves multiplication,
> as defined by the axioms of ring theory,
> must be commutative when this is not true.

Wrong. The set of integers, along with usual addition and
multiplication functions on the integers can be constructed starting
from Peano's Axioms (including induction) by using the axioms of logic
and set theory.

Download my DC Proof 2.0 software at

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.