The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology S 162
Replies: 7   Last Post: Nov 30, 2012 5:00 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 95
From: Korea
Registered: 2/23/12
Re: Matheology S 162
Posted: Nov 30, 2012 5:02 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

> > Sure.  Aside from the fact, you know, that ZFC
> proves there is a set of
> > natural numbers.
> That's because even silliest claims, when called
> axioms, have to be
> worshipped by the community of matheologians.
> Regards, WM

Which by the way is precisely as silly as the claim that every element
of a group possesses an inverse. Which is in WM's terms equally
worshipped, i.e. it is used because it is useful.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.