Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Topic:
resolution and clarity to kinetic energy Chapt13.409 Pair Production has to equal Pair Annihilation #1054 New Physics #1174 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Replies:
3
Last Post:
Dec 4, 2012 8:59 AM




Re: positron & electron annihilation as rare event Chapt13.409 Pair Production has to equal Pair Annihilation #1056 New Physics #1176 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Posted:
Dec 3, 2012 8:47 PM


On Dec 3, 5:21 pm, Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote: > positron & electron annihilation as rare event Chapt13.409 Pair > Production has to equal Pair Annihilation #1055 New Physics #1175 ATOM > TOTALITY 5th ed > > On Dec 3, 2:22 pm, Archimedes Plutonium > > > > > > > > > > <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Alright, I finally have this solved so that I can equalize the Pair > > Production with Pair Annihilation. > > > The resolution also gives us more in the fact that the neutrino is a > > form of the photon. > > > We start with the basic unit of charge which is the magnetic monopole > > of either 1M or 1M+. The neutrino begins at 2 eV kinetic energy and > > so the most simple and fundamental particle is the electronneutrino > > which is represented as a Double Transverse Wave as this: > > > 1M 1M+ > > > Now we derive the next fundamental particle with the addition of one > > more M and each M represents 1eV of kinetic energy. The next > > fundamental particle is this in DTW theory: > > > M > > M M+ > > > and it has 3 eV kinetic energy. > > > Now we add a 4th M then a 5th M and a 6th M etc etc and like a > > pinwheel we add more M's to this Double Transverse Wave structure. So > > the 4th M looks like this: > > > M > > M M+ > > M+ > > > and the 5th M looks like this: > > > 2M > > M M+ > > M+ > > > Now as we add more and more M's, nothing really happens much except > > when the M's get up into the millions of M's, because the lowest > > photon has a E electric charge in it and the E charge begins with the > > electron at 0.5 x 10^6 eV. > > > So once we have the M's on the double transverse waves > > with millions of eV kinetic energy, then we have a electron created. > > Surprisingly we do not yet have a photon created since once the M's > > add up to 0.5 MeV, the M's form the first E, electric charge, and > > where the M's of positive or negative M charge readily convert to > > either + or  M charge. > > > 1.25*10^5M > > 1.25*10^5M 1.25*10^5M+ > > 1.25*10^5M+ > > > converts to approximately this: > > 0.5*10^6M > > 1M 1M+ > > 1M+ > > which converts to this: > > > E > > M M+ > > > The very big surprise in this is that the electron is more primitive > > than even the photon. Because the photon requires two E charges of + > > and  E charges. > > > The hierarchy of kinetic energy is that the neutrino is the lowest, > > then comes the electron once the M's have reached a quantity of > > 0.5*10^6 eV then an electron is borne. > > > Once the quantity of M's reaches 1*10^6 eV then both a E and E+ is > > borne and we have our first photon of a radio wave photon, we keep on > > adding more M's until we reach > > the M's having 938 MeV of M's which yields our first proton borne. > > > Now I am able to show how Pair Production equal Pair Annihilation. > > Now I do not know if any readers of my posts have ever witnessed a > electron positron annihilation event in a laboratory. And whether they > see flashes of light or something to indicate something not usual is > going on. > > I have not witnessed a electron positron annihilation. > > So what I am anxious about in the Double Transverse Wave theory is > that such an event of a positron to electron annihilation would be > quite noticeable, considering there are likely to be 10^10 electrons > and 10^10 positrons at the tip of my finger, ready to engage in an > annihilation, yet they never do. > > So one can read all the textbooks of physics and all the journal > articles of physics and mistakenly think that 10^10 annihilation > events occur every minute near the tip of my finger. When in reality a > positronelectron annihilation event is very rare. You actually have > to work hard at building a machine that creates these annihilation > events. > > So that as the pinwheel of adding more M's to the Double Transverse > Wave builds the electron > > 1.25*10^5M > 1.25*10^5M 1.25*10^5M+ > 1.25*10^5M+ > > which then converts to approximately this: > 0.5*10^6M > 1M 1M+ > 1M+ > > which is a restmass electron. > > That the pinwheel of adding more magnetic monopoles has to build 3 > more of those 0.5x10^6 M's to build just 2 gamma ray photons. > > So that we are talking about immense energy of a electron and positron > before they annihilate into 2 gamma ray photons. > > So the common knowledge that electrons and positrons are plentiful in > Nature, yet so very few and rare cases of annihilation, implies my > above > is correct. > > Now as for why or how the M's conveniently switch back and forth > between being a + or  charge magnetic monopole, I have no explanation > for the how and why. > > Google's NewNewsgroups censors AP posts and halted a proper > archiving?of author, but Drexel's Math Forum does not and my posts?in > archive form is seen here: > > http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986 > > Archimedes Plutoniumhttp://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium > whole entire Universe is just one big atom > where dots of the electrondotcloud are galaxies
Univese can not have one without the other.We know the end results when hitting. Tebet



