The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 175
Replies: 3   Last Post: Dec 10, 2012 1:54 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 18,076
Registered: 1/29/05
Matheology § 175
Posted: Dec 9, 2012 5:06 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Matheology § 175

Until then, no one envisioned the possibility that infinities come in
different sizes, and moreover, mathematicians had no use for ?actual
infinity.? The arguments using infinity, including the Differential
Calculus of Newton and Leibniz, do not require the use of infinite
T. Jech: "Set Theory", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2002)

There are only countably many names.
An uncountable set of names cannot be well-ordered - because it does
not exist.
A set of numbers cannot be well-ordered unless all the numbers have
This seems to contradict Cantor's diagonal argument - but only if
infinite set are complete.

Conclusion: Infinities do not come come in different sizes. In fact
mathematicians have never had use for actual infinity because they
could not. All they could is to believe that they had use for actual
infinity, i. e., for numbers that have no names and cannot be used.
That's called mathelogy.

Regards, WM

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.