On 13 Dez., 20:57, Zuhair <zaljo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Are you are too dishonest, to confess your error? Or do you really not > > understand, that your pieces of paths are irrelevant? > > They are indeed relevant.
> We don't need the zero before the decimal > point at all, all what we need is the string of digits AFTER the > decimal,
i.e., after the 0. So the string begins with 0 as I said and not with 1 as you tried to show.
> Your argument is simply the following: > > All reals are definable by parameter free finite formulas. > > Since we have countably many of those formulas. > > Then we have countably many reals. > > This argument is FALSE, simply because not all reals are definable by > parameter free finite formulas.
Wrong. My argument is simply that you cannot find out by nodes which paths I use to construct the complete Binary Tree. Therefore you cannot defined by nodes which paths are missing.