In article <email@example.com>, "Ross A. Finlayson" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > requires that they be listable, but one can prove that they are not > > listable by showing that no list of them can be complete. > > And no mater how vociferously WM tries to argue otherwise, in standard > > mathematics that can all be done. > > -- > > > Well, not when "standard" was "pre-Cantorian"
I used only the present tense which eliminates pre-Cantorianism. --