Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals.
Replies: 11   Last Post: Jan 5, 2013 10:30 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Virgil Posts: 8,833 Registered: 1/6/11
Re: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals.
Posted: Jan 5, 2013 6:56 PM

In article
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 5 Jan., 17:47, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
> > On 1/5/2013 6:56 AM, WM wrote:
> >

> > > Nonsense. A real number need not be given by a string of digits. In
> > > most cases that is even impossible. Given is a finite definition like
> > > "pi". And this is distinct from all other real numbers.

> >
> > "pi" is certainly a finite string used as a name.

>
> But it allows to calculate a potentially infinite string. i.e., a
> finite string with more than any given number of digits.

> >
> > Please offer a (Russellian) description that attaches it
> > to an idea of number.
> >
> > And, since you make provability an issue in these matters,
> > pi from other numbers.

>
> I show it by what you think when reading my pi.

To be as sure as you claim, ,you would have to be a mindreader and read
the mind of someone your have probably never met and don't know where to
find.

> Mathematics is discourse, sending and receiving messages.

So is Morse code.
--

Date Subject Author
1/4/13 Jesse F. Hughes
1/5/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
1/5/13 fom
1/5/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
1/5/13 Virgil
1/5/13 Virgil
1/5/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
1/5/13 Virgil
1/5/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
1/5/13 Virgil
1/5/13 fom