Virgil
Posts:
8,833
Registered:
1/6/11


Re: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals.
Posted:
Jan 5, 2013 7:01 PM


In article <8614b98bc5174ae39bc967caf0383920@w3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de> wrote:
> On 5 Jan., 22:26, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@phiwumbda.org> wrote: > > WM <mueck...@rz.fhaugsburg.de> writes: > > > On 4 Jan., 22:36, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@phiwumbda.org> wrote: > > > > >> Sure, there's only countably many finite sequences over {0,...,9}, if > > >> that's what you mean, but I don't see what that has to do with whether R > > >> is countable or not. > > > > > So you are blind. Let me try to make you see. > > > > Sorry, but I'm not in the mood to discuss this topic with you. > > It is not a matter of mood, as anybody can see by your attempt to have > the reals restricted to 2^n elements, it is a matter of distinguished > incompetence. > > Regards, WM
It is also a matter of WM's undistingished but nearly universal incompetence. 

