Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals.
Replies: 3   Last Post: Jan 5, 2013 7:01 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals.
Posted: Jan 5, 2013 7:01 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
<8614b98b-c517-4ae3-9bc9-67caf0383920@w3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 5 Jan., 22:26, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@phiwumbda.org> wrote:
> > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes:
> > > On 4 Jan., 22:36, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@phiwumbda.org> wrote:
> >
> > >> Sure, there's only countably many finite sequences over {0,...,9}, if
> > >> that's what you mean, but I don't see what that has to do with whether R
> > >> is countable or not.

> >
> > > So you are blind. Let me try to make you see.
> >
> > Sorry, but I'm not in the mood to discuss this topic with you.

>
> It is not a matter of mood, as anybody can see by your attempt to have
> the reals restricted to 2^n elements, it is a matter of distinguished
> incompetence.
>
> Regards, WM


It is also a matter of WM's undistingished but nearly universal
incompetence.
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.