Virgil
Posts:
4,483
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: The Distinguishability argument of the Reals.
Posted:
Jan 5, 2013 7:01 PM
|
|
In article
<8614b98b-c517-4ae3-9bc9-67caf0383920@w3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 5 Jan., 22:26, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@phiwumbda.org> wrote:
> > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes:
> > > On 4 Jan., 22:36, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@phiwumbda.org> wrote:
> >
> > >> Sure, there's only countably many finite sequences over {0,...,9}, if
> > >> that's what you mean, but I don't see what that has to do with whether R
> > >> is countable or not.
> >
> > > So you are blind. Let me try to make you see.
> >
> > Sorry, but I'm not in the mood to discuss this topic with you.
>
> It is not a matter of mood, as anybody can see by your attempt to have
> the reals restricted to 2^n elements, it is a matter of distinguished
> incompetence.
>
> Regards, WM
It is also a matter of WM's undistingished but nearly universal
incompetence.
--
|
|
