The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: honeycombs
Replies: 9   Last Post: Jan 24, 2013 5:40 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Martin Brown

Posts: 259
Registered: 12/13/04
Re: honeycombs
Posted: Jan 22, 2013 2:48 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 22/01/2013 05:50, RichD wrote:
> I saw a news item about a new technique to draw CO2 from
> the atmosphere. It's a chemical process, using amines,
> which binds with the molecule, coated on a large structure,
> in the shape of a honeycomb.
> According to the story, this maximizes surface area.
> ok, mathematicians, which function gets optimized by a
> honeycomb? What are the constraints and assumptions?

2D problem to *minimise* the surface area to occupy a given volume. Bees
use it to make honeycomb with the least amount of wax.

It is not difficult to show that the angle between sides must be 120
degrees and that equal lengths minimise total length/area occupied.

They have the structure just about as wrong as it is possible to be
unless the stuff they are making it out of is extremely precious.

The 3D problem to occupy volume with a foam of minimum surface area is
far more interesting and gives rise to Plateau's laws of soap films. The
Kelvin foam structure was optimal until fairly recently when
Weare-Phelan discovered a 3% better solution using a pair of shapes. A
whole new family has been found but as yet a proof of optimality eludes.

Martin Brown

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.