Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 201
Replies: 32   Last Post: Jan 28, 2013 2:26 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
William Hughes

Posts: 1,764
Registered: 12/7/10
Re: Matheology § 201
Posted: Jan 28, 2013 3:58 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Jan 28, 9:45 am, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 28 Jan., 08:44, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> > On Jan 27, 11:23 pm, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 27, 11:16 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
> > > > On 27 Jan., 23:02, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jan 27, 10:39 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On 27 Jan., 21:40, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Jan 27, 6:46 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On 27 Jan., 18:32, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > On Jan 27, 6:05 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > <snip>
>
> > > > > > > > > >..the diagonal
> > > > > > > > > > cannot differ from all lines
> > > > > > > > > > (it differs from every line, though).

>
> > > > > > > > > The fact that the diagonal differs from every line is
> > > > > > > > > enough to show (induction) that the diagonal is not
> > > > > > > > > equal to any line in the list.

>
> > > > > > > > No.
>
> > > > > > > Let the antidiagonal be d and the nth line be l(n)
>
> > > > > > > We know that for each n in |N, d is not equal to l(n)
>
> > > > > > > You have agreed that this implies
>
> > > > > > > There is no m in |N such that d equals l(m)
>
> > > > > > No.
>
> > > > > You contradict yourself.  You have agreed
> > > > > that if P(n) is true for every n then
> > > > > the is no n such that P(n) is false.

>
> > > > Don't turn the words in my mouth.
>
> > > You have apparently forgotten the
> > > thread in which you agreed to this.

>
> I did not agree to that,
>
>
>

> > A simple proof.
>
> > The statements
>
> >     i.  for every natural number n, P(n) is true
> >     ii. there exists a natural number m such that P(m)
> >         is false

>
> > cannot both be true at the same time.
> > If you prove that i. is true then it follows
> > that ii. is false.-

>
> You have not yet understood.



Either

i and ii. cannot be true at the same time.
i. true implies ii. false

or

It is not know that i. and ii. cannot be
true at the same time

i. true does not imply ii. false


Are you claiming that it is not known that i.
and ii. cannot be true at the same time?


Date Subject Author
1/27/13
Read Matheology § 201
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology § 201
William Hughes
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology § 201
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology § 201
William Hughes
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology S 201
Jesse F. Hughes
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology S 201
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology S 201
Jesse F. Hughes
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology S 201
Virgil
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology S 201
William Hughes
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology § 201
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology § 201
William Hughes
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology § 201
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology � 201
Virgil
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology § 201
William Hughes
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology § 201
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology § 201
William Hughes
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology § 201
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology § 201
William Hughes
1/28/13
Read Re: Matheology § 201
William Hughes
1/28/13
Read Re: Matheology § 201
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
1/28/13
Read Re: Matheology § 201
William Hughes
1/28/13
Read Re: Matheology § 201
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
1/28/13
Read Re: Matheology § 201
William Hughes
1/28/13
Read Re: Matheology § 201
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
1/28/13
Read Re: Matheology § 201
William Hughes
1/28/13
Read Re: Matheology � 201
Virgil
1/28/13
Read Re: Matheology � 201
Virgil
1/28/13
Read Re: Matheology � 201
Virgil
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology � 201
Virgil
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology � 201
Virgil
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology � 201
Virgil
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology � 201
Virgil
1/27/13
Read Re: Matheology � 201
Virgil

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.