On Feb 5, 3:36 pm, socratus <socra...@bezeqint.net> wrote: > On Feb 5, 2:09 pm, David Bernier <david...@videotron.ca> wrote: > > > > > > > On 02/05/2013 06:41 AM, socratus wrote: > > > > Alice in Quantumland > > > =. > > > The theory of quantum electrodynamics describes Nature as absurd > > > from the point of view of common sense. > > > And it agrees fully with experiment. > > > So I hope you accept Nature as She is ? absurd. > > > / QED : The Strange Theory of Light and Matter > > > page. 10. by R. Feynman / > > > > ? Many believe that relative theory tells us that ours > > > is a kind of Alice-in-Wonderland universe; that this > > > revealed by the mathematician Einstein who discovered > > > that there is a fourth dimension, . . . .. . . that, in short, > > > everything is relative and mysterious. ? > > > / Book ?Albert Einstein? , page 4. By Leopold Infeld ./ > > > > We still don't know that negative 4-D is. (!) > > > > In the other words: > > > Physicists show us the absurd and mysterious existence > > > of nature as a real fact. > > > I cannot believe that nature is absurd and mysterious. > > > I think that their interpretations in relative and > > > quantum electrodynamics theories were wrong. > > > ==.. > > > ' But I don't want to go among mad people,' said Alice. > > > 'Oh, you can't help that,' said the cat. 'We're all mad here.' > > > / Lewis Carroll. > > > Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. / > > > > . > > > Yes. In between two thoughts, what are you thinking? > > > dave > > I think that it is possible to understand the universe > using usual common logical thought. > We need only understand in which zoo (reference frame ) > physicists found higgs-dozon and 1000 its elementary brothers. > > socratus > > .- Hide quoted text - >
It is impossible using particle accelerators to understand god-particles and the ultimate truth of nature as physicists hope. =. To create particle accelerators is needed reference frame of vacuum. (!) It means that physicists take vacuum as a reflector of the real (!) structure of nature: the space between billions and billions galaxies.
But on the other hand, today's physicists refuse to take vacuum T=0K as real fundament of Universe. ? It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero simple have no meaning.? / Book : ?Dreams of a final theory? Page 138. By Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 / =. Question: Does one physicist hand know that the other hand makes? =. ( maybe without vacuum the CERN is good place for formula-I competition . . ? ! ) =. Socratus