"Bruno Luong" <email@example.com> wrote in message <firstname.lastname@example.org>... > "Carl S." wrote in message <email@example.com>... > > ... the dirac delta of v ... > > The expression above alone does not make meaningful sense. A dirac is a function (to be more precise a distribution). There is no such thing as "the dirac of somethingelse". > > Bruno
Sorry Bruno, I mean that the result of the dirac delta function of the parameter v. Here, v is a vector. What is the result of the function? A vector ? A scalar ?