Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology 203
Replies: 16   Last Post: Feb 7, 2013 8:06 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Virgil

Posts: 7,021
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology 203
Posted: Feb 7, 2013 2:53 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article
<457d0429-33c1-46ad-9151-4f5d9dc96a8e@fv9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:

> On 7 Feb., 05:21, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote:
>

> > Or as Virgil would write
>
> in a very lucid moment:
>

> > What Cantor proved was that no list of accessible real numbers
> > (accessible because listable) can include all accessible numbers,
> > because any such list itself proves the existence of numbers not listed.

>
> That is, Cantor proved the countable set of accessible numbers being
> uncoutable.


That may well be WM's misunderstanding but it is not an understanding.

A number being accessible does means that it can appear in some list,
but does not at all mean that all accessible numbers can appear together
in a single list. For that to hold one must first be sucked into
WMytheology.
--





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.