In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 7 Feb., 05:21, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: > > > Or as Virgil would write > > in a very lucid moment: > > > What Cantor proved was that no list of accessible real numbers > > (accessible because listable) can include all accessible numbers, > > because any such list itself proves the existence of numbers not listed. > > That is, Cantor proved the countable set of accessible numbers being > uncoutable.
That may well be WM's misunderstanding but it is not an understanding.
A number being accessible does means that it can appear in some list, but does not at all mean that all accessible numbers can appear together in a single list. For that to hold one must first be sucked into WMytheology. --