On Feb 20, 11:51 am, Kevin <barry196...@yahoo.com> wrote: > So there is the 2-D version of Schrodinger's Cat and a 3-D version, > neither of which I control. So the 2-D version is interesting... > curious... and relatively pain free... Does the 2-D version of > Schrodinger's Cat 'fold' because it is 2-D? Fine with me if it works > in my favor (yawn)... So the first rule of folding must be that it is > impossible to look directly into the eye of the Cyclops. But wait!! > The 2-D version of Schrodinger's Cat is just a bait or hook to make me > feel the same way about the 3-D version of Schrodinger's Cat... Yeah, > well, the 3-D version of Schrodinger's Cat seems contrived and maybe > even cartoonish... Maybe you should ask the alcoholic Santa with post > traumatic stress what he thinks about the 3-D version... but only > after he is done spraying the tall grass with machine gun fire.