Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
Re: Automating an iterative procedure
Posted:
Feb 23, 2013 4:01 PM
|
|
Dear,
B1(1) and B0(1) are given matrices in iteration 1, then for the next 99 iterations I want to calculate updates of these matrices.
dpb <none@non.net> wrote in message <kgb86j$446$1@speranza.aioe.org>...
> On 2/23/2013 2:04 PM, Milos Milenkovic wrote:
> ...
> > K1=[-0.2582 -18.596 0 -0.2582;
> > -34.737 -1300.188 0 -34.737;
> ...
> > for i=1:100
> > B1(1)=[0.01 0.02 0.07 0.03;
> > 0.02 0.05 0.06 0.02;
> > 0.07 0.09 0.01 0.03;
> > 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.04];
>
> ...
>
> No, but why would you want to duplicate a constant array anyway?
> Sometimes for matrix operations there's a need/desire to do so, but
> generally a temporary via repmat() or some other technique would be more
> reasonable than just holding multiple copies of the same array.
>
> B1(1) refers to a single array location whereas the rhs is an array.
> "Can't put 5-lbs of 'taters in a 1-lb tote" to use the E TN vernacular.
>
> Only a cell array element can hold another array.
>
> --
|
|
|
|
