Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
Re: Alternative solution for NAN
Posted:
Feb 27, 2013 6:08 AM
|
|
"Torsten" wrote in message <kgko7b$e4d$1@newscl01ah.mathworks.com>...
> "Carl S." wrote in message <kgkmon$aeo$1@newscl01ah.mathworks.com>...
> > "Torsten" wrote in message <kgklbh$6ph$1@newscl01ah.mathworks.com>...
> > > "Carl S." wrote in message <kgki2g$rie$1@newscl01ah.mathworks.com>...
> > > > The following code gives NAN (Not a Number) values
> > > > [U,D]=eig(N);
> > > >
> > > > To solve this problem, I wrote that
> > > > while(det(N) == 0)
> > > > N=(1e-10.*randi(1,size(N)))*eye(size(N));
> > > > end
> > > >
> > > > But, the loop does not stop
> > >
> > > Your matrix N within the loop always has determinant (1e-10)^(size(N))
> > > which may become very small if N is large.
> > >
> > > :( Are there any alternative solution instead of this loop to solve the NAN problem ?
> > >
> > > Depends on the original matrix N.
> > >
> > > Best wishes
> > > Torsten.
> >
> > Dear Torsten,
> > The matrix N has standard deviation values of grayscale images. So, it changes for each image. How to solve the NAN problem in this case ?
>
> Did you check whether the matrix N already contains NaN values ?
>
> Best wishes
> Torsten.
Yes, I have checked with this codes
if isnan(N)==1
h=1;
else
h=0;
end
This code return that h=0
|
|
|
|
