On Mar 1, 8:19 pm, Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 28, 1:42 pm, Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote: > > > Google Groups is 100% uncensored, so it isn't fully indexed. Were Google Groups fully indexed, it'd be used to game the system; i.e. people would use it to push up the ranking of certain web sites. Large (sub)threads with lots of authors are more likely to be real; i.e. posts with lots of good replies are more likely to be indexed. Google Groups isn't Wikipedia, so it's not indexed as if it were. > > Sounds like a lot of double-speak, and I would hazard to guess > that Jeff is a employee of Google, perhaps overseeing the blocked > from view of 2,000 of Archimedes Plutonium's posts since May of 2012.
Honestly, you're not that important; no one here is. Do you honestly think that someone employed by Google will spend time monitoring your posts? Think about it: Google returns those search results that are the most linked, and your posts don't generally generate any replies. It's nothing personal, but to do purely with the content of your posts.
Clicking on your Google profile shows that you've generated 20,198 posts since 2008, and people can click on the messages if they want to view them.