
Re: R > oo
Posted:
Mar 8, 2013 2:28 AM


On Mar 8, 4:43 pm, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 8, 4:13 am, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 8, 7:49 am, William Hughes <wpihug...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 7, 10:07 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > every single string appears on the DIAGONAL and ANTIDIAGONAL > > > > This is false, you know it is false and you have admitted > > > it is false. > > > true by induction on Diagonals of N1 digits long > > on NxN lists. > > True but irrelevant. For infinite diagonals > of (inf)x(inf) lists it is false, > you know it is false and you > have admitted it is false.
As the List increases in size to several times the BASE the fraction of decimal strings possible on the permuted diagonal increases to 1 and stays there.
That ANTIROWS don't coincide with the DIAGONAL is just semantics!
Your claim is GIVEN AN INFINITE LIST you can calculate a missing real.
NO TURING MACHINE CAN DO THAT AND HALT!
Herc

