Virgil
Posts:
8,833
Registered:
1/6/11


Re: ZFC is inconsistent
Posted:
Mar 17, 2013 3:40 PM


In article <1c311c21bdb74367a670ebab1db380b1@bs5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>, WM <mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de> wrote:
> You do not understand! Every part of an individual that you can refer > to is one of finitely many.
That does not apply to all individual sets, for example not to the set of points in a line segment.
At least in any standard form of Euclidian geometry.
######################################################################
WM has frequently claimed that HIS mapping from the set of all infinite binary sequences to the set of paths of a CIBT is a linear mapping.
In order to show that such a mapping is a linear mapping, WM would first have to show that the set of all binary sequences is a linear space (which he has not done and apparently cannot do) and that the set of paths of a CIBT is also a vector space (which he also has not done and apparently cannot do) and then show that his mapping, say f, satisfies the linearity requirement that f(ax + by) = af(x) + bf(y), where a and b are arbitrary members of the field of scalars and x and y and f(x) and f(y) are arbitrary members of suitable linear spaces.
While this is possible, and fairly trivial for a competent mathematician to do, WM has not yet been able to do it.
But frequently claims already to have done it. 

