On 3/18/2013 6:13 AM, WM wrote: > On 18 Mrz., 07:02, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: >> On 3/17/2013 11:49 AM, WM wrote: >> >>> On 17 Mrz., 13:09, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: >> >>>> Playing with crayons does nothing to >>>> account for the apparent successes of >>>> mathematics with respect to its >>>> applications. >> >>> Please try to find only 1 (one) single application of set theory - >>> appart from the jokes mentioned in Kalenderblatt 1053 - 1060 (texts >>> there are mainly in English). >>> http://www.hs-augsburg.de/~mueckenh/KB/KB%201001-1111.pdf >> >>> Don't confuse matheology with mathematics! >> >> I understand that you want to >> argue about beliefs. > > On the contrary. I am looking for any applications of infinite set > theory. But hitherto I could not find anything serious. > >> Why do you think Brouwer's ideal mathematician >> is pre-linguistic? > > I did not say so.
You argue from the positions associated with his philosophy, yet you will not defend that philosophy or explain how your statements are properly understood in relation to that philosophy.
Your response is intended to narrow the discussion to only the things you say.
But, you have the audacity to contradict me when I remark,
>> I understand that you want to >> argue about beliefs.