Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Comparing Compactifactions
Replies:
6
Last Post:
Mar 20, 2013 10:30 PM




Re: Comparing Compactifactions
Posted:
Mar 20, 2013 1:36 AM


On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, David C. Ullrich wrote: > > >Let (f,X) and (y,Y) be compactifications of S. > >Assume h in C(Y,X) and f = hg. > > > >Thue h is a continuous surjection and when Y is Hausdorff > >a closed quotient map. > > > >k = hg(S):g(S) > f(S) is a continuous bijection. > >It it a homeomorphism? If so, what's a proof like? > > I doubt that it follows that k is a homeomorphism, > although I'm not going to try to give a counterexample. I'll have to check this out, but isn't k = fg^1:g(S) > f(S) a homeomorphism?
> Assuming it doesn't follow, then k being a homeomorphism > "should" be part of the _definition_ of the partial > order on the class of compactifications that we're > struggling to define here. > > > > >



