Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 231
Replies: 9   Last Post: Mar 25, 2013 5:42 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Scott Berg

Posts: 2,027
Registered: 12/12/04
Re: Matheology � 231
Posted: Mar 25, 2013 12:01 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"AMeiwes" <invalid@invalid.com> wrote in message
> "WM" <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote in message
> news:dbfd5ab8-59cd-4156-9a63-11bf94b2705e@l5g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
> Matheology § 231

>>One philosophically important way in which numbers and sets, as they
>>are naively understood, differ is that numbers are physically
>>instantiated in a way that sets are not. Five apples are an instance
>>of the number 5 and a pair of shoes is an instance of the number 2,
>>but there is nothing obvious that we can analogously point to as an
>>instance of, say, the set {{/0}}.
>>[Nik Weaver: "Is set theory indispensable?"]
>>Regards, WM

> the disclamer, ".....naively understood....."
> what is a /0 anyway ?

" Five apples are an instance of the number 5 "
- no, it is a count of 5 apples
- an "instance" is just the 5 written or displayed

"...a pair of shoes is an instance of the number 2,..."

-no, it is one ( 1 ) pair not two,
- and it is a count, not an instance of the character indicating a 2 .

Why are you posting such self-defecating posts filled with intentional
errors ?

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2015. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.