The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 233
Replies: 33   Last Post: Apr 7, 2013 5:26 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Alan Smaill

Posts: 1,103
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 233
Posted: Apr 3, 2013 9:05 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

WM <> writes:

> What did I say?
> This: After every line n of the list of all rational numbers there are
> infinitely many rational numbers that up to digit n are identical with
> the anti-diagonal up to digit n.
> This holds for the digits up to every finite n. And more digits cannot
> be expected to exist in any decimal representation of a number.

So far you are in agreement with the drug-crazed Cantorists.
You must therefore be in error.

> Regards, WM

Alan Smaill

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.