In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, WM <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 18 Apr., 09:22, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > In article > > <7256d794-e1a7-4366-9f47-c6294e2d3...@b3g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>, > > > > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote: > > > Up to any line L_n it is clear that C contains not more than that > > > line. > > > > So a suitably truncated column cotains no more than some line, but when > > not truncated contains more than any one line. > > More than any "given" line. But here the question reads: Does A > contain more than any present line?
Mote than any one line however selected. > > By construction every set of numbers of T is a subset of some line.
Wrong! Outside of Wolkenmuekenheim there is a set having one member of from line which is not a subset of any line.
> You can see this, when, during construction of T
I cannot cross my eyes far enough to see that.
> > How do your answers change, when the construction of T is done by > unioning instead of appending? > All lines L_n with n < m are uniond with L_m when line L_m is added.
Quite so, but there is no last line, even though |N is the union of all lines. --