The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.stat.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Common sense and NHST
Replies: 1   Last Post: Jun 20, 2013 12:10 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Luis A. Afonso

Posts: 4,758
From: LIsbon (Portugal)
Registered: 2/16/05
Re: Common sense and NHST
Posted: Jun 20, 2013 12:10 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

As promised I will show that a sequence of two no-significant tests could very well lead to a significant over all result: two not sufficient evidence to reject H0 --- > reject this hypothesis.
It is used the fact that p-values, p(i), do follow a Uniform Distribution *** and k of them are such that (Ronald Fisher) :
________H = -2 * Sum (1<= j <= k) Log(p(j))
H is distributed like a Chi-square, k degrees of freedom.
*** The conditions:
___1___i.i.d. data,
___2___Testing H0: miu= true Population value (not shifted)

Then for k=2, H = -2*Log(p(1)) - 2*Log(p(2))
5% significance Critical Value H = 5.99146.
Simulating 1000´000 p(2), random numbers, when fixed p(1) successively from 0.05(0.05)0.95 the following Table was calculated:
____________p(1)___prob. to 5% significant
The 2nd column is the frequencies to which H was exceeded owing to p(2)=RND. Note that for p(1)=0.95 we almost attain the 5% level, as it must be from construction when p(1)=1.00000.

Luis A. Afonso

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.