On Thursday, 20 June 2013 23:54:10 UTC+2, Virgil wrote: > In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > On 20 Jun., 20:25, FredJeffries <fredjeffr...@gmail.com> >
> > > No. A sequence is a function with domain the natural numbers.
> > However, have you really not understood that the sets of a sequence of sets can be unioned?
> How is "A sequence is a function with domain the natural numbers." incompatible with "a sequence o sets can be unioned"? They are certainly compatible
Not in FredJeffries' world. FredJeffries wrote:
================================== A sequence is not a set. Speaking of taking the union of a sequence is gibberish. Treating a sequence of sets as a set of sets is the work of a chowderhead, a clown or a charlatan. ==================================