> In article <email@example.com>, > firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: > >> On Thursday, 27 June 2013 02:12:17 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote: >> > 1/aleph_0 is not defined. >> >> Let X > 100 ==> 1/X < 1. >> aleph_0 > 100 is defined. >> > > > If WM claims that that is amathematicaly acceptable definition of > 1/aleph_0, > WM again reveals his immense ineptitude at things mathematical.
The asshole idiot WM is incapable of comprehending simple definitions which - therefore - it calls 'unexisting'. ROFL.