Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 295
Replies: 24   Last Post: Jun 30, 2013 3:32 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Tanu R.

Posts: 475
Registered: 12/13/04
Re: Matheology � 295
Posted: Jun 27, 2013 2:48 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Virgil wrote:

> In article <a460c1fb-f1a1-4826-9ec0-66fe933de2f4@googlegroups.com>,
> mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de wrote:
>

>> On Thursday, 27 June 2013 02:12:17 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote:
>> > 1/aleph_0 is not defined.
>>
>> Let X > 100 ==> 1/X < 1.
>> aleph_0 > 100 is defined.
>>

>
>
> If WM claims that that is amathematicaly acceptable definition of
> 1/aleph_0,
> WM again reveals his immense ineptitude at things mathematical.


The asshole idiot WM is incapable of comprehending simple definitions
which - therefore - it calls 'unexisting'. ROFL.



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.