On 7/6/2013 6:20 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote: > "fom" <fomJUNK@nyms.net> wrote in message > news:QrGdnSwFF7s95krMnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@giganews.com... > >> Still, there are few choices: >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnchhausen_trilemma >> >> Take your pick: circularity, infinite regress, or meaningless syntax. > > Oh, come on, those are the choices for the mindless rationalist only. >
Suppose one merely imposes a constraint upon "knowledge" in so far as it be "objective".
There are an indeterminate number of choices for subjective knowledge. Its limits lie with the imagination of the individual.