On 7/7/2013 4:26 AM, email@example.com wrote: > On Saturday, 6 July 2013 23:59:55 UTC+2, fom wrote: > >> No statement has been falsified before it is expressed. > > Just yours has been wrong before you wrote it already. > Another example: There cannot be a flase statement." >
One difference is that my statement contains a temporal index, whereas yours does not.
You seem unable to be consistent with your own views on falsifiability.
>> You engage in a search for statements that cannot be falsified. > > False. As a physicist I engaged in a search for statements that hopefully will not be falsified.
Thus, physics is a "hopeful" enterprise.
Why do you "hope" for such things?
I will not repeat myself concerning the objectives of "science" in relation to political advantage.
You engage in a search for statements that cannot be falsified.
You do so with purpose. You may call it "hope" if you prefer Orwellian newspeak.