fom
Posts:
1,968
Registered:
12/4/12


Re: Matheology § 300
Posted:
Jul 9, 2013 9:03 PM


On 7/9/2013 4:56 PM, Virgil wrote: > In article <c736cc7723fd4071bdfdecc651edc381@googlegroups.com>, > mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de wrote: > >> On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 22:47:23 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote: >>> The function behaves differently at omega, maybe? The study of Mathematics >>> is about finding where Analogies breakdown. This happens a lot at the >>> Limit Ordinal Omega. >> >> For instance it happens in the Cantor list. Here we have as many lines as we >> have steps in the urn. If there something unexpected can happen "at omega", >> it can also happen in the Cantor list "at omega". But the list has no line >> omega? Why do you think then that the urn has a step omega? > > WM, as usual, misses the point that any mark that indicating that an > infinite process is completed is not a part of the process. > > The time of noon is not a part of the infinite process of moving balls > into and out of the vase but is a mark that that process has ended, and > that every natural that has a successor has been both inserted into and > then removed from the vase. >
I told him to read that quote from Kant...
:)

