The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 300
Replies: 20   Last Post: Jul 11, 2013 3:47 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 300
Posted: Jul 10, 2013 1:46 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <>, wrote:

> On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 23:49:59 UTC+2, Virgil wrote:
> > In article <>,
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >

> > > On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 22:19:00 UTC+2, Zeit Geist wrote:
> >
> > > > I have have produced the necessary function to prove the case.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Not my case. I keep at least one number. Is set theory incapable of
> >
> > > describing that case?
> >
> >
> >
> > Until you have, and post, a unique numeral for than number, there is no
> >
> > reason to suppose that any such number exists

> There is no such number existing. But there is my clause existing that I will
> never give away the last number.

Your clause existing does not prove that that what it claims is true.
Considering WM's long record of false claims, it rather indicates the

What don't you understand with this clause?
> You understand that this clause kills all Cantorism and matheology since
> every young student who has not been perverted by "modern logic" will of
> course see that this clause is possible.

Outside of WM's wild weird world of WMytheology, that clause is just
another of WM's unproven and unprovable claims.
> Of course, for you, I am very sorry, it is to late. You will never change
> your mind. You will never recognize that Cantor gave a terrible stroke to
> mathematics from which it will recover only after decades.

In any choice between mathematics and WM. everyone who does not depend
on WM for a passing grade will side for mathematics against WM.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.