The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 300
Replies: 20   Last Post: Jul 11, 2013 3:47 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 8,833
Registered: 1/6/11
Re: Matheology � 300
Posted: Jul 11, 2013 3:13 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <>, wrote:

> On Thursday, 11 July 2013 08:44:22 UTC+2, Virgil wrote:

> > > Nevertheless one can wonder what would happen in case the premise is
> > > accepted?

> > How about the premise that there is a set with a first element and
> > for each element a successor element and which is a subset of any
> > other set with those properties?
> >
> > Or a set of sets which contains {}, and for each of its members, m,
> > also contains m\/{m} and is minimal with respect to those
> > properties?
> >
> > They are premises that are far more widely accepted than any of the
> > ones corrupting WM's wild weird world of WMytheology.

> Doing mathematics is deriving theorems from premises

Whereas WMytheology is messing about with premises without producing
anything like theorems.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.