Virgil
Posts:
8,833
Registered:
1/6/11


Re: Matheology � 300
Posted:
Jul 11, 2013 3:13 AM


In article <89cf6966eb21479bb65b9678c71fb93f@googlegroups.com>, mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de wrote:
> On Thursday, 11 July 2013 08:44:22 UTC+2, Virgil wrote: > > > > Nevertheless one can wonder what would happen in case the premise is > > > accepted? > > > How about the premise that there is a set with a first element and > > for each element a successor element and which is a subset of any > > other set with those properties? > > > > Or a set of sets which contains {}, and for each of its members, m, > > also contains m\/{m} and is minimal with respect to those > > properties? > > > > They are premises that are far more widely accepted than any of the > > ones corrupting WM's wild weird world of WMytheology.
> Doing mathematics is deriving theorems from premises
Whereas WMytheology is messing about with premises without producing anything like theorems. 

