Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: angle dy/dx for y = 1/x function #15 Uni-textbook 7th ed.: TRUE
CALCULUS; without the phony limit concept

Replies: 10   Last Post: Jul 22, 2013 2:40 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 JT Posts: 1,448 Registered: 4/7/12
Re: quantum spin 1/2 explained as circumnavigation of a triangle
instead of the enclosed square; why we need 120 system not 360

Posted: Jul 22, 2013 2:25 PM

Den måndagen den 22:e juli 2013 kl. 20:07:02 UTC+2 skrev Archimedes Plutonium:
> On Monday, July 22, 2013 5:58:33 AM UTC-5, jonas.t...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> (snipped)
>

> >
>
> >
>
> > I think you have to learn your AI recognize the difference between the sum of internal and external angles of a polygon.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > The external angles always add up to 360 degrees or 1 revolution for any polygon.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > The internal angles use the formula in revolutions
>
> >
>
> > n/2-1
>
> >
>
> > or in degrees
>
> >
>
> > 360(n/2-1)
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > and each inner angle in revolutions
>
> >
>
> > (n/2-1)/n
>
> >
>
> > or in degrees
>
> >
>
> > 360(n/2-1)/n
>
>
>
> Get out of math. You are not cut out for it. You are a philosopher, where opinion waxs the day. In science, evidence waxs the days.
>
>
>
> You asked me why I wrote 135 degrees rather than 0.375 revolutions.
>
>
>
> I told you why, because your birdbrain fruitcake suggestion cannot distinguish between 0.375 internal revolution or between 0.375 external revolution.
>
>
>
> If math education were left up to you, a teenager would have to say "teacher, it is 0.375 internal revolution" whereas the teenager of today simply says "135 degrees.
>

Stop the fucking nonsense you suggested and still suggest something that is utterly wrong. You think just because you measure in revolutions the sum of outer and inner angles of a polygon become the same?

Now you just playing stupid or are this going somewhere?
Each outer angle in revolutions would be 360/8=45 degrees that is 1/8 revolutions or are you really that stupid you ask me about the formula for each outer angle, when you know that all polygons outer angles add up to 360?

1/n where n is the vertices?
I can not see how this can go by you once you realise that the sum of outer angles is always one revolution.

>
> So get on over there to alt.philosophy for your lack of math abilities and science understanding is a waste of time here in sci.math.
>
>
>
> AP

Date Subject Author
7/20/13 plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
7/21/13 JT
7/21/13 JT
7/22/13 plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
7/22/13 JT
7/22/13 JT
7/22/13 plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
7/22/13 JT
7/22/13 JT
7/22/13 JT
7/22/13 JT